Every vote on this decision
New allegations of Russian interference in the European Parliament, in the upcoming EU elections and the impact on the Union
54 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 12 amendments (2 adopted, 10 rejected) and 35 parts of the text voted on separately (33 adopted, 2 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 12
-
Vote 1:Amendment 10 to paragraph 2
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 2 - Am 10
Rejected 106 for, 389 against, 15 abstained
13:45Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 7:Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 6
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le § 6 - Am 11
Adopted 272 for, 169 against, 61 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 10:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 13
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le § 13 - Am 4
Rejected 72 for, 402 against, 39 abstained
13:47Roll call requested by ID
-
Vote 21:Amendments 12 + 1 (voted as one) to paragraph 24
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 24 - Am 12PC1
Rejected 83 for, 384 against, 36 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 22:Amendments 12 + 2 (voted as one) to paragraph 25
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 25 - Am 12PC2
Rejected 136 for, 362 against, 6 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 30:Amendment 5 to recital C
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant C - Am 5
Rejected 92 for, 383 against, 28 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 33:Amendment 13, adding text after Recital C
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant C - Am 13
Adopted 274 for, 207 against, 24 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 34:Amendment 6 to recital N
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant N - Am 6
Rejected 92 for, 397 against, 17 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 41:Amendment 3, adding text after Recital R
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant R - Am 3
Rejected 72 for, 396 against, 36 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by ID
-
Vote 45:Amendment 7 to recital Z
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant Z - Am 7
Rejected 122 for, 310 against, 75 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 46:Amendment 8, adding text after Recital Z
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant Z - Am 8
Rejected 105 for, 363 against, 36 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 47:Amendment 9, adding text after Recital Z
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant Z - Am 9
Rejected 87 for, 405 against, 14 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by ECR
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 35
35 votes on parts of the text: 33 adopted, 2 rejected
-
Vote 2:Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2
Rejected show of hands
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
‘Expresses its outrage at the participation of MEPs in a pro-Russian media outlet, ‘Voice of Europe’,’
-
Vote 3:Paragraph 2 — part 1
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 2/1
Adopted 445 for, 49 against, 19 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
‘Expresses its outrage at the participation of MEPs in a pro-Russian media outlet, ‘Voice of Europe’,’
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘while Russia is waging its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine; emphasises that most views propagated by MEPs on ‘Voice of Europe’ do not reflect the stance of the vast majority of MEPs, who overwhelmingly denounce Russia’s unlawful invasion of Ukraine, its employment of hybrid warfare tactics against European democracy, and its other aggressive and anti-democratic policy decisions in recent years;’
-
Vote 5:Separate vote on paragraph 4
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 4
Adopted 446 for, 18 against, 20 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by Renew
-
Vote 6:Separate vote on paragraph 5
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 5
Adopted 454 for, 15 against, 16 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by Renew
-
Vote 8:Separate vote on paragraph 8
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 8
Adopted 452 for, 15 against, 22 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by Renew
-
Vote 9:Separate vote on paragraph 13
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 13
Adopted 429 for, 63 against, 15 abstained
13:46Roll call requested by Renew
-
Vote 11:Separate vote on paragraph 14
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 14
Adopted 431 for, 28 against, 45 abstained
13:47Roll call requested by Renew
-
Vote 12:Separate vote on paragraph 16
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by ECR
-
Vote 13:Paragraph 18 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ID
‘Believes that the recent allegations might constitute sanctionable behaviour under its Code of Conduct and if confirmed must be met with the firmest response;’
-
Vote 14:Paragraph 18 — part 2
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 18/2
Adopted 493 for, 6 against, 10 abstained
13:47Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID
The part voted on
‘underlines the importance of immediately conducting a thorough internal investigation in order to assess all possible cases of foreign interference from Russia and other countries in the European Parliament;’
-
Vote 15:Paragraph 18 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID
The part voted on
‘underlines the importance of immediately conducting a thorough internal investigation in order to assess all possible cases of foreign interference from Russia and other countries in the European Parliament;’
-
Vote 16:Paragraph 20 — part 1
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 20/1
Adopted 424 for, 35 against, 48 abstained
13:47Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘Calls for Parliament to introduce mandatory, effective and regular training on security, interference, ethical standards, compliance and integrity for all MEPs and their offices and for all Parliament staff,’
-
Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 20
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 18:Paragraph 20 — part 3
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 20/3
Adopted 423 for, 63 against, 23 abstained
13:48Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘calls for Parliament’s services to put in place effective monitoring and surveillance systems to detect foreign interference while respecting MEPs’ freedom of mandate;’
-
Vote 19:Paragraph 21 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
Text as a whole without the words: ‘through a dedicated parliamentary body’
-
Vote 20:Paragraph 21 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 23:Separate vote on paragraph 25
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
-
Vote 24:Paragraph 25 — part 2
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 25/2
Adopted 420 for, 55 against, 26 abstained
13:48Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
those words
-
Vote 25:Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
‘Insists on the need to do more to protect the European information environment and EU citizens’ right to access reliable information;’
-
Vote 26:Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘recalls the need to establish, as stated in Parliament’s previous reports, ‘mirror clauses’ whereby the openness of the European information space to third countries would be proportionate to the access European media outlets have in these countries;’
-
Vote 27:Paragraph 27 — part 3 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
‘underlines that the media outlets working for hostile and authoritarian regimes should not have access to European Parliament premises;’
-
Vote 28:Paragraph 27 — part 4
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 27/4
Adopted 386 for, 79 against, 44 abstained
13:49Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘insists that labelling on platforms should go beyond identifying deep fakes to also establish positive labelling using tools created by the media sector, such as the Journalism Trust Initiative;’
-
Vote 29:Paragraph 27 — part 4 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘insists that labelling on platforms should go beyond identifying deep fakes to also establish positive labelling using tools created by the media sector, such as the Journalism Trust Initiative;’
-
Vote 31:Recital C — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘whereas Russia has systematically maintained contacts with far-right and far-left parties, and other personalities and movements to gain support from institutional actors within the Union in order to legitimise its illegal and criminal actions; whereas analysis of voting patterns and speeches in the European Parliament has shown these parties to have been the most sympathetic to Russia, including calls as extreme as those made in public in January 2024 by Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Miroslav Radačovský – who was also paid by Russian sources to observe the parliamentary elections in Russia in 2021 – for the destruction of Europe;’
-
Vote 32:Recital C — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
‘whereas the Hungarian Fidesz party has been spreading pro-Kremlin messages and propaganda;’
-
Vote 35:Recital N — part 1 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘whereas, according to media analyses, since August 2023, 16 far-right MEPs from Germany, France, the Netherlands, Italy, Slovakia, Estonia, Spain, Croatia, Denmark and Belgium participated in debates and interviews organised by ‘Voice of Europe’;’ without the words ‘far-right’
-
Vote 36:Recital N — part 2 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
‘far-right’
-
Vote 37:Recital N — part 3 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘whereas the vast majority of these politicians tend to normalise manifestations of hatred and intolerance based on race, national origin or sexual orientation and to project a vision of Russia as the authentic keeper of traditional family values;’
-
Vote 38:Recital N — part 4 of 4
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
‘whereas the public discourse of those politicians is leading to dangerous divisions in society as a whole, and is a threat to democracy;’
-
Vote 39:Separate vote on recital Q
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant Q
Adopted 365 for, 52 against, 90 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by Renew
-
Vote 40:Separate vote on recital R
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant R
Adopted 416 for, 66 against, 12 abstained
13:50Roll call requested by Renew
-
Vote 42:Recital T — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘whereas there is credible evidence that, in 2020, Peter Pelligrini, then Prime Minister of Slovakia, requested the help of the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban to obtain support from the Kremlin ahead of Slovakia’s 2020 parliamentary election; whereas this resulted in a visit by Prime Minister Pelligrini to Russia in February 2020, three days before the elections were held;’
-
Vote 43:Recital T — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on
‘whereas the 2023 parliamentary elections were targeted by further Russian interference and disinformation campaigns; whereas Peter Pelligrini is now President-elect of Slovakia and due to take office in June 2024;’
-
Vote 44:Separate vote on recital W
Rejected show of hands
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 1
-
Vote 48:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote
RC-B9-0262/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Adopted 429 for, 27 against, 48 abstained
13:51Roll call requested by Renew
Alternative motions · 6
-
Vote 49:Alternative motion for a resolution
B9-0261/2024
Lapsed show of hands
-
Vote 50:Alternative motion for a resolution
B9-0262/2024
Lapsed show of hands
-
Vote 51:Alternative motion for a resolution
B9-0263/2024
Lapsed show of hands
-
Vote 52:Alternative motion for a resolution
B9-0264/2024
Lapsed show of hands
-
Vote 53:Alternative motion for a resolution
B9-0265/2024
Lapsed show of hands
-
Vote 54:Alternative motion for a resolution
B9-0266/2024
Lapsed show of hands