Paragraph 20 — part 3
New allegations of Russian interference in the European Parliament, in the upcoming EU elections and the impact on the Union
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 20/3
Adopted
- For
- 423
- Against
- 63
- Abstained
- 23
roll-call vote at 13:48 · 83% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘calls for Parliament’s services to put in place effective monitoring and surveillance systems to detect foreign interference while respecting MEPs’ freedom of mandate;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | For |
| Greens | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| S&D | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| Renew | 34 | 0 | 0 | 34 | For |
| EPP | 73 | 1 | 0 | 74 | For |
| ECR | 3 | 15 | 3 | 21 | Against |
| Patriots | 11 | 5 | 2 | 18 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | Against |
| No group | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
21 MEPs of 509 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.