Paragraph 20 — part 1
New allegations of Russian interference in the European Parliament, in the upcoming EU elections and the impact on the Union
RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 20/1
Adopted
- For
- 424
- Against
- 35
- Abstained
- 48
roll-call vote at 13:47 · 84% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘Calls for Parliament to introduce mandatory, effective and regular training on security, interference, ethical standards, compliance and integrity for all MEPs and their offices and for all Parliament staff,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | For |
| Greens | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| S&D | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| Renew | 33 | 0 | 0 | 33 | For |
| EPP | 78 | 0 | 0 | 78 | For |
| ECR | 3 | 4 | 14 | 21 | Abstained |
| Patriots | 5 | 10 | 3 | 18 | Divided |
| ESN | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | Divided |
| No group | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
6 MEPs of 507 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.