Amendment 22 — part 2, after paragraph 15
2022 discharge: EU general budget - Commission
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 15 – Am 22/2
Rejected
- For
- 272
- Against
- 333
- Abstained
- 9
roll-call vote at 12:28 · 44% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ID · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: ‘regrets the fact that NGOs and civil society organisations are still exempt from most anti-money laundering transparency and reporting obligations; emphasises that European Court of Auditors Special report No 35/2018 warns that NGOs are prone to be used for money laundering purposes; calls, therefore, for a definition of NGOs to be established at Union level and for NGOs to be brought within the scope of Union action to combat money laundering’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 61 | 0 | 61 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 37 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| EPP | 74 | 4 | 3 | 81 | For |
| ECR | 24 | 1 | 2 | 27 | For |
| Patriots | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| ESN | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | For |
| No group | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
4 MEPs of 614 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.