Every vote on this decision
2022 discharge: EU general budget - Commission
60 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 19 amendments (9 adopted, 10 rejected) and 39 parts of the text voted on separately (21 adopted, 16 rejected, 2 lapsed).
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 2
-
Vote 1:Final vote · the decisive vote
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Proposal for a decision
Passed 438 for, 167 against, 5 abstained
12:26 -
Vote 60:Final vote — text as a whole
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 417 for, 172 against, 22 abstained
12:37
A proposed change to the text, voted on before the final vote. · 19
19 amendment votes: 9 adopted, 10 rejected
-
Vote 2:Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 5
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 5 – Am 19
Rejected 175 for, 416 against, 11 abstained
12:26Roll call requested by ID
-
Vote 5:Amendment 24 to paragraph 9
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 9 – Am 24
Adopted 330 for, 232 against, 45 abstained
12:27Roll call requested by S&D
-
Vote 6:Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 11
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 11 – Am 25
Adopted 317 for, 175 against, 116 abstained
12:27Roll call requested by EPP
-
Vote 7:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 14
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 14 – Am 9
Adopted 467 for, 105 against, 35 abstained
12:27Roll call requested by S&D
-
Vote 8:Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 15
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 15 – Am 21
Rejected 144 for, 454 against, 13 abstained
12:27Roll call requested by ID
-
Vote 9:Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 1
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 15 – Am 22/1
Rejected 151 for, 456 against, 3 abstained
12:28Roll call requested by ID · split vote by EPP
The part voted on
‘Points out that the Qatargate scandal exposed both civil society organisations as catalysts for corruption as well as malicious interference by foreign governments’
-
Vote 10:Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 2
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 15 – Am 22/2
Rejected 272 for, 333 against, 9 abstained
12:28Roll call requested by ID · split vote by EPP
The part voted on
‘regrets the fact that NGOs and civil society organisations are still exempt from most anti-money laundering transparency and reporting obligations; emphasises that European Court of Auditors Special report No 35/2018 warns that NGOs are prone to be used for money laundering purposes; calls, therefore, for a definition of NGOs to be established at Union level and for NGOs to be brought within the scope of Union action to combat money laundering’
-
Vote 12:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 18
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 18 – Am 3
Rejected 100 for, 427 against, 87 abstained
12:28Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 13:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 18 – Am 4
Rejected 71 for, 440 against, 98 abstained
12:28Roll call requested by The Left
-
Vote 14:Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 18
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 18 – Am 26
Rejected 266 for, 309 against, 41 abstained
12:28Roll call requested by EPP
-
Vote 26:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 109 — part 1
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 109 – Am 29/1
Adopted 588 for, 4 against, 21 abstained
12:30Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Expresses strong concern about the recent case of alleged misuse of Union funds in contracts involving the purchase of face masks known as the “Koldo case”; is concerned that this misuse of Union funds and Union taxpayers’ money involved 14.6 million Euro from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and 3.1 million Euro from the EU Solidarity Fund; regrets that the EPPO received the relevant information from a private individual and not from the relevant national authority’, ‘notes that the alleged misuse of funds in the case was not discovered by the Commission despite having conducted audits’ and ‘further notes that similar situations have occurred in other Member States including in a recently uncovered case of alleged fraud in Portugal involving ERDF funds and several cases in the Czech Republic on alleged misuse of REACT-EU funds in the purchase of medical equipment’
-
Vote 27:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 109 — part 2
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 109 – Am 29/2
Adopted 367 for, 230 against, 10 abstained
12:30Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D
those words
-
Vote 28:Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 20 – Am 37/1
Rejected 271 for, 325 against, 14 abstained
12:30Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP
Text as a whole without the words: ‘to discover any possible connections of the Spanish Government and the Spanish Socialist Party to this scheme’
-
Vote 35:Amendment 30 to paragraph 191
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 191 – Am 30
Adopted 305 for, 245 against, 44 abstained
12:31Roll call requested by EPP
-
Vote 47:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 196 — part 1
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 196 – Am 31/1
Adopted 482 for, 14 against, 103 abstained
12:33Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D
Text as a whole without the words: ‘regrets the lack of focus of the EEAS and the Commission in the area of conflict-related sexual violence against women’
-
Vote 48:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 196 — part 2
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 196 – Am 31/2
Adopted 352 for, 139 against, 103 abstained
12:34Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D
those words
-
Vote 52:Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 213
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 213 – Am 35
Adopted 382 for, 144 against, 80 abstained
12:36Roll call requested by Greens
-
Vote 58:Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 275
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 275 – Am 32
Rejected 274 for, 318 against, 18 abstained
12:37Roll call requested by ECR
-
Vote 59:Amendment 33 to paragraph 280, after point i
A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 280, after point i – Am 33
Rejected 259 for, 328 against, 22 abstained
12:37Roll call requested by ECR
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 39
39 votes on parts of the text: 21 adopted, 16 rejected, 2 lapsed or other
-
Vote 3:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 4:Separate vote on paragraph 8
Adopted 420 for, 153 against, 30 abstained
-
Vote 11:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 17
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 22
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 16:Separate vote on paragraph 27
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 33
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 42
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 55, point ii
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 21:Separate vote on paragraph 55, after point viii
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 55, after point x
Rejected 264 for, 334 against, 8 abstained
-
Vote 23:Separate vote on paragraph 69
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 24:Separate vote on paragraph 98
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 25:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 104
Adopted show of hands
-
Vote 29:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 20
Lapsed no count
-
Vote 30:Paragraph 158 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP
Text as a whole without the words: ‘by assigning such significant amounts to HERA’
-
Vote 31:Paragraph 158 — part 2 of 2
Adopted 314 for, 292 against, 6 abstained
Split vote by EPP
those words
-
Vote 32:Paragraph 188 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘notes that the review, finalised on 21 November 2023, has shown that the Commission applies adequate ex-ante and ex-post controls, that the safeguards in place are effective and that no evidence has been found to date that money has been diverted for unintended purposes’
-
Vote 33:Paragraph 188 — part 2 of 2
Adopted 346 for, 247 against, 13 abstained
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
those words
-
Vote 34:Separate vote on paragraph 190
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Renew
-
Vote 36:Separate vote on paragraph 191
Lapsed show of hands
Separate vote by Renew
-
Vote 37:Paragraph 192 — part 1 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
Text as a whole without the words: ‘Expresses deep concern regarding the recent announcement by some countries of suspension of funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) pending the outcome of the investigation;’ and ‘increased and sustained funding in recognition of the agency’s crucial role in the humanitarian response in Gaza, and’
-
Vote 38:Paragraph 192 — part 2 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
‘Expresses deep concern regarding the recent announcement by some countries of suspension of funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) pending the outcome of the investigation;’
-
Vote 39:Paragraph 192 — part 3 of 3
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
‘increased and sustained funding in recognition of the agency’s crucial role in the humanitarian response in Gaza, and’
-
Vote 40:Paragraph 193 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
‘Stresses the importance of education and the critical need to denounce and eradicate all manifestations of hate speech and violent actions on both sides; underscores that the suspension of funding should not occur arbitrarily or without transparent and independent evidence of misuse;
-
Vote 41:Paragraph 193 — part 2 of 2
Rejected show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
‘commends UNRWA for its indispensable humanitarian endeavours in Gaza and its pivotal role in delivering quality education, with a specific emphasis on fostering a human rights culture, even in challenging times;’
-
Vote 42:Paragraph 194 — part 1 of 2
Adopted 310 for, 276 against, 26 abstained
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
‘Recalls that the findings of the study commissioned by the Commission to Georg Eckert Institute on the Palestinian Textbooks revealed a complex picture where the textbooks (i) adhere to UNESCO standards and adopt criteria that are prominent in international education discourse, including a strong focus on human rights, (ii) express a narrative of resistance within the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and (iii) display an antagonism towards Israel; notes that the Union does not fund the Palestinian Textbooks and that neither are they the responsibility of UNRWA, which works to deliver quality education with an emphasis on fostering a human rights culture, even in challenging times;’
-
Vote 43:Paragraph 194 — part 2 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
‘underlines that education and pupils’ access to peaceful and unbiased textbooks is essential; stresses Parliament’s position that textbooks drafted by Union funds, must be made conditional on full compliance with UNESCO standards of peace and tolerance; as already was decided upon by the Parliament in its 2023 recommendation on relations with the Palestinian Authority, and as repeatedly requested in its latest adopted resolutions on Prospects for the Two-State Solution;’
-
Vote 44:Separate vote on paragraph 195
Rejected 240 for, 354 against, 21 abstained
-
Vote 45:Separate vote on paragraph 195
Rejected 283 for, 313 against, 16 abstained
-
Vote 46:Separate vote on paragraph 196
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Renew
-
Vote 49:Separate vote on paragraph 197
Adopted show of hands
Separate vote by Renew
-
Vote 50:Paragraph 198 — part 1 of 2
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
‘Is concerned about the destruction and confiscation of Union-funded projects in the West Bank and notes that in 2022, 101 structures funded by the Union or Member States were demolished or seized by Israel with a value at EUR 337 019, representing the third highest financial injury since 2016; recalls that representatives of Union institutions, concerned Member States and other donors have requested on several occasions the return or compensation for Union-funded assets demolished, dismantled or confiscated;’
-
Vote 51:Paragraph 198 — part 2 of 2
Adopted 345 for, 183 against, 69 abstained
Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew
The part voted on
‘recalls the position of the Council expressing its commitment to ensure that all agreements between Israel and the Union must unequivocally and explicitly indicate the inapplicability to the territories occupied by Israel since 1967, as well as to continue the effective implementation of existing Union law and bilateral arrangements applicable to settlement products;’
-
Vote 53:Separate vote on paragraph 234
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 54:Separate vote on paragraph 250
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 55:Separate vote on paragraph 257
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 56:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 259
Rejected show of hands
-
Vote 57:Separate vote on paragraph 272
Rejected show of hands