Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

2022 discharge: EU general budget - Commission

60 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 19 amendments (9 adopted, 10 rejected) and 39 parts of the text voted on separately (21 adopted, 16 rejected, 2 lapsed).

· 2

  1. Vote 1:Final vote · the decisive vote

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Proposal for a decision

    Passed 438 for, 167 against, 5 abstained

    12:26
  2. Vote 60:Final vote — text as a whole

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)

    Adopted 417 for, 172 against, 22 abstained

    12:37

· 19

19 amendment votes: 9 adopted, 10 rejected
  1. Vote 2:Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 5

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 5 – Am 19

    Rejected 175 for, 416 against, 11 abstained

    12:26

    Roll call requested by ID

  2. Vote 5:Amendment 24 to paragraph 9

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 9 – Am 24

    Adopted 330 for, 232 against, 45 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by S&D

  3. Vote 6:Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 11

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 11 – Am 25

    Adopted 317 for, 175 against, 116 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by EPP

  4. Vote 7:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 14

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 14 – Am 9

    Adopted 467 for, 105 against, 35 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by S&D

  5. Vote 8:Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 15

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 15 – Am 21

    Rejected 144 for, 454 against, 13 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by ID

  6. Vote 9:Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 1

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 15 – Am 22/1

    Rejected 151 for, 456 against, 3 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by ID · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘Points out that the Qatargate scandal exposed both civil society organisations as catalysts for corruption as well as malicious interference by foreign governments’

  7. Vote 10:Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 2

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 15 – Am 22/2

    Rejected 272 for, 333 against, 9 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by ID · split vote by EPP

    The part voted on

    ‘regrets the fact that NGOs and civil society organisations are still exempt from most anti-money laundering transparency and reporting obligations; emphasises that European Court of Auditors Special report No 35/2018 warns that NGOs are prone to be used for money laundering purposes; calls, therefore, for a definition of NGOs to be established at Union level and for NGOs to be brought within the scope of Union action to combat money laundering’

  8. Vote 12:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 18

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 18 – Am 3

    Rejected 100 for, 427 against, 87 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by The Left

  9. Vote 13:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 18 – Am 4

    Rejected 71 for, 440 against, 98 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by The Left

  10. Vote 14:Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 18

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 18 – Am 26

    Rejected 266 for, 309 against, 41 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by EPP

  11. Vote 26:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 109 — part 1

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 109 – Am 29/1

    Adopted 588 for, 4 against, 21 abstained

    12:30

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘Expresses strong concern about the recent case of alleged misuse of Union funds in contracts involving the purchase of face masks known as the “Koldo case”; is concerned that this misuse of Union funds and Union taxpayers’ money involved 14.6 million Euro from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and 3.1 million Euro from the EU Solidarity Fund; regrets that the EPPO received the relevant information from a private individual and not from the relevant national authority’, ‘notes that the alleged misuse of funds in the case was not discovered by the Commission despite having conducted audits’ and ‘further notes that similar situations have occurred in other Member States including in a recently uncovered case of alleged fraud in Portugal involving ERDF funds and several cases in the Czech Republic on alleged misuse of REACT-EU funds in the purchase of medical equipment’

  12. Vote 27:Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 109 — part 2

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 109 – Am 29/2

    Adopted 367 for, 230 against, 10 abstained

    12:30

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D

    those words

  13. Vote 28:Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 20 – Am 37/1

    Rejected 271 for, 325 against, 14 abstained

    12:30

    Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by EPP

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘to discover any possible connections of the Spanish Government and the Spanish Socialist Party to this scheme’

  14. Vote 35:Amendment 30 to paragraph 191

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 191 – Am 30

    Adopted 305 for, 245 against, 44 abstained

    12:31

    Roll call requested by EPP

  15. Vote 47:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 196 — part 1

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 196 – Am 31/1

    Adopted 482 for, 14 against, 103 abstained

    12:33

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘regrets the lack of focus of the EEAS and the Commission in the area of conflict-related sexual violence against women’

  16. Vote 48:Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 196 — part 2

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 196 – Am 31/2

    Adopted 352 for, 139 against, 103 abstained

    12:34

    Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by S&D

    those words

  17. Vote 52:Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 213

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 213 – Am 35

    Adopted 382 for, 144 against, 80 abstained

    12:36

    Roll call requested by Greens

  18. Vote 58:Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 275

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – After § 275 – Am 32

    Rejected 274 for, 318 against, 18 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by ECR

  19. Vote 59:Amendment 33 to paragraph 280, after point i

    A9-0139/2024 – Isabel García Muñoz – § 280, after point i – Am 33

    Rejected 259 for, 328 against, 22 abstained

    12:37

    Roll call requested by ECR

· 39

39 votes on parts of the text: 21 adopted, 16 rejected, 2 lapsed or other
  1. Vote 3:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6

    Rejected show of hands

  2. Vote 4:Separate vote on paragraph 8

    Adopted 420 for, 153 against, 30 abstained

  3. Vote 11:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 17

    Rejected show of hands

  4. Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 22

    Adopted show of hands

  5. Vote 16:Separate vote on paragraph 27

    Rejected show of hands

  6. Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 33

    Adopted show of hands

  7. Vote 18:Separate vote on paragraph 42

    Rejected show of hands

  8. Vote 19:Separate vote on paragraph 42

    Rejected show of hands

  9. Vote 20:Separate vote on paragraph 55, point ii

    Rejected show of hands

  10. Vote 21:Separate vote on paragraph 55, after point viii

    Adopted show of hands

  11. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 55, after point x

    Rejected 264 for, 334 against, 8 abstained

  12. Vote 23:Separate vote on paragraph 69

    Adopted show of hands

  13. Vote 24:Separate vote on paragraph 98

    Rejected show of hands

  14. Vote 25:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 104

    Adopted show of hands

  15. Vote 30:Paragraph 158 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘by assigning such significant amounts to HERA’

  16. Vote 31:Paragraph 158 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 314 for, 292 against, 6 abstained

    Split vote by EPP

    those words

  17. Vote 32:Paragraph 188 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘notes that the review, finalised on 21 November 2023, has shown that the Commission applies adequate ex-ante and ex-post controls, that the safeguards in place are effective and that no evidence has been found to date that money has been diverted for unintended purposes’

  18. Vote 33:Paragraph 188 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 346 for, 247 against, 13 abstained

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    those words

  19. Vote 34:Separate vote on paragraph 190

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Renew

  20. Vote 36:Separate vote on paragraph 191

    Lapsed show of hands

    Separate vote by Renew

  21. Vote 37:Paragraph 192 — part 1 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    Text as a whole without the words: ‘Expresses deep concern regarding the recent announcement by some countries of suspension of funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) pending the outcome of the investigation;’ and ‘increased and sustained funding in recognition of the agency’s crucial role in the humanitarian response in Gaza, and’

  22. Vote 38:Paragraph 192 — part 2 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    ‘Expresses deep concern regarding the recent announcement by some countries of suspension of funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) pending the outcome of the investigation;’

  23. Vote 39:Paragraph 192 — part 3 of 3

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    ‘increased and sustained funding in recognition of the agency’s crucial role in the humanitarian response in Gaza, and’

  24. Vote 40:Paragraph 193 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    ‘Stresses the importance of education and the critical need to denounce and eradicate all manifestations of hate speech and violent actions on both sides; underscores that the suspension of funding should not occur arbitrarily or without transparent and independent evidence of misuse;

  25. Vote 41:Paragraph 193 — part 2 of 2

    Rejected show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    ‘commends UNRWA for its indispensable humanitarian endeavours in Gaza and its pivotal role in delivering quality education, with a specific emphasis on fostering a human rights culture, even in challenging times;’

  26. Vote 42:Paragraph 194 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted 310 for, 276 against, 26 abstained

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    ‘Recalls that the findings of the study commissioned by the Commission to Georg Eckert Institute on the Palestinian Textbooks revealed a complex picture where the textbooks (i) adhere to UNESCO standards and adopt criteria that are prominent in international education discourse, including a strong focus on human rights, (ii) express a narrative of resistance within the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and (iii) display an antagonism towards Israel; notes that the Union does not fund the Palestinian Textbooks and that neither are they the responsibility of UNRWA, which works to deliver quality education with an emphasis on fostering a human rights culture, even in challenging times;’

  27. Vote 43:Paragraph 194 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    ‘underlines that education and pupils’ access to peaceful and unbiased textbooks is essential; stresses Parliament’s position that textbooks drafted by Union funds, must be made conditional on full compliance with UNESCO standards of peace and tolerance; as already was decided upon by the Parliament in its 2023 recommendation on relations with the Palestinian Authority, and as repeatedly requested in its latest adopted resolutions on Prospects for the Two-State Solution;’

  28. Vote 44:Separate vote on paragraph 195

    Rejected 240 for, 354 against, 21 abstained

  29. Vote 45:Separate vote on paragraph 195

    Rejected 283 for, 313 against, 16 abstained

  30. Vote 46:Separate vote on paragraph 196

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Renew

  31. Vote 49:Separate vote on paragraph 197

    Adopted show of hands

    Separate vote by Renew

  32. Vote 50:Paragraph 198 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    ‘Is concerned about the destruction and confiscation of Union-funded projects in the West Bank and notes that in 2022, 101 structures funded by the Union or Member States were demolished or seized by Israel with a value at EUR 337 019, representing the third highest financial injury since 2016; recalls that representatives of Union institutions, concerned Member States and other donors have requested on several occasions the return or compensation for Union-funded assets demolished, dismantled or confiscated;’

  33. Vote 51:Paragraph 198 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted 345 for, 183 against, 69 abstained

    Split vote by EPP · separate vote by Renew

    The part voted on

    ‘recalls the position of the Council expressing its commitment to ensure that all agreements between Israel and the Union must unequivocally and explicitly indicate the inapplicability to the territories occupied by Israel since 1967, as well as to continue the effective implementation of existing Union law and bilateral arrangements applicable to settlement products;’

  34. Vote 53:Separate vote on paragraph 234

    Rejected show of hands

  35. Vote 54:Separate vote on paragraph 250

    Rejected show of hands

  36. Vote 55:Separate vote on paragraph 257

    Rejected show of hands

  37. Vote 56:Vote on text inserted after paragraph 259

    Rejected show of hands

  38. Vote 57:Separate vote on paragraph 272

    Rejected show of hands

← Back to the decision