Paragraph 15 — part 2
2022 discharge: EU general budget - Court of Auditors
A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 15/2
Adopted
- For
- 570
- Against
- 4
- Abstained
- 26
roll-call vote at 13:00 · 95% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID
The part voted on: ‘is concerned that, for the audit work concerning the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), the Court still does not have full access to the new reporting tool on RRF, FENIX, and that the information in that new tool is not updated in a timely manner; supports the Court’s view that Article 257 of the Financial Regulation provides for full and immediate access rights for the Court; further calls on the Commission to grant access to the Court to other types of relevant information in order to fulfil its role;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | For |
| Greens | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | For |
| S&D | 58 | 0 | 0 | 58 | For |
| Renew | 39 | 0 | 0 | 39 | For |
| EPP | 80 | 0 | 0 | 80 | For |
| ECR | 25 | 1 | 0 | 26 | For |
| Patriots | 17 | 0 | 6 | 23 | For |
| ESN | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | For |
| No group | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
5 MEPs of 600 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.