Every vote on this decision
2022 discharge: EU general budget - Court of Auditors
5 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published., where every MEP’s position is recorded.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted).
The last vote on a text as a whole, after all amendments. It decides whether the text is adopted. · 2
-
Vote 1:Final vote · the decisive vote
A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision
Passed 578 for, 19 against, 1 abstained
13:00 -
Vote 5:Final vote — text as a whole
A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted 583 for, 10 against, 8 abstained
13:01
A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. · 3
-
Vote 2:Separate vote on paragraph 3
Adopted 425 for, 159 against, 12 abstained
-
Vote 3:Separate vote on paragraph 15
Adopted show of hands
Split vote by ID
-
Vote 4:Paragraph 15 — part 2
A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 15/2
Adopted 570 for, 4 against, 26 abstained
13:00Roll call requested by ID · split vote by ID
The part voted on
‘is concerned that, for the audit work concerning the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), the Court still does not have full access to the new reporting tool on RRF, FENIX, and that the information in that new tool is not updated in a timely manner; supports the Court’s view that Article 257 of the Financial Regulation provides for full and immediate access rights for the Court; further calls on the Commission to grant access to the Court to other types of relevant information in order to fulfil its role;’