Paragraph 23 — part 2
EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries
A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 23/2
Adopted
- For
- 360
- Against
- 134
- Abstained
- 58
roll-call vote at 12:27 · 65% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by MEPs
The part voted on: ‘and that it should be, in priority, regulated in the framework of the Technical Measures Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 2019/1241 ), whose aim is, as its title indicates, ‘the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems’;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 8 | 0 | 9 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 25 | 1 | 26 | Against |
| S&D | 42 | 9 | 2 | 53 | For |
| Renew | 30 | 1 | 4 | 35 | For |
| EPP | 69 | 1 | 1 | 71 | For |
| ECR | 11 | 7 | 2 | 20 | Divided |
| Patriots | 6 | 6 | 10 | 22 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | Abstained |
| No group | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
9 MEPs of 552 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.