Skip to content
EU Parl Watch

Every vote on this decision

EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries

26 votes in the order they were taken.Links open the , where every MEP’s position is recorded.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (7 adopted, 7 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted).

· 14

  1. Vote 1:Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 1 – Am 1

    Adopted 347 for, 177 against, 14 abstained

    12:24

    Roll call requested by The Left

  2. Vote 3:Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 2

    Adopted 331 for, 202 against, 15 abstained

    12:25

    Roll call requested by Greens

  3. Vote 4:Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 3

    Adopted 294 for, 215 against, 46 abstained

    12:25

    Roll call requested by The Left

  4. Vote 5:Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 11

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 11 – Am 4

    Adopted 259 for, 255 against, 35 abstained

    12:25

    Roll call requested by Greens

  5. Vote 9:Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 5

    Adopted 325 for, 211 against, 19 abstained

    12:25

    Roll call requested by Greens

  6. Vote 10:Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 13

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 6

    Rejected 239 for, 251 against, 63 abstained

    12:26

    Roll call requested by Greens

  7. Vote 11:Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 14

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 14 – Am 7

    Rejected 189 for, 330 against, 42 abstained

    12:26

    Roll call requested by Greens

  8. Vote 12:Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 17 – Am 8

    Adopted 279 for, 206 against, 68 abstained

    12:26

    Roll call requested by Greens

  9. Vote 13:Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 18

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 18 – Am 9

    Rejected 177 for, 343 against, 38 abstained

    12:26

    Roll call requested by Greens

  10. Vote 14:Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 18

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 18 – Am 10

    Rejected 187 for, 308 against, 53 abstained

    12:26

    Roll call requested by Greens

  11. Vote 19:Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 23

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 11

    Rejected 252 for, 284 against, 11 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by The Left

  12. Vote 20:Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 23

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 12

    Rejected 233 for, 289 against, 37 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by The Left

  13. Vote 21:Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 13

    Rejected 146 for, 397 against, 15 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by The Left

  14. Vote 25:Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 39

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 39 – Am 14

    Adopted 276 for, 265 against, 13 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by Greens

· 11

  1. Vote 2:Separate vote on paragraph 7

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 7

    Adopted 419 for, 124 against, 11 abstained

    12:24

    Roll call requested by Greens · separate vote by MEPs

  2. Vote 6:Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by MEPs

    The part voted on

    ‘Highlights that MPAs are diverse in terms of size, species, habitats and ecosystems to be protected, are established with different conservation objectives, and should not be seen as uniform areas that all bring the benefits of well-managed MPAs for marine ecosystems;’

  3. Vote 7:Paragraph 13 — part 2

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 13/2

    Adopted 425 for, 122 against, 11 abstained

    12:25

    Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by MEPs

    The part voted on

    ‘considers, therefore, that the Commission’s action plan presents an oversimplified and over-generalised approach, thus giving the impression that all MPAs can be implemented and managed in the same way, illustrated for example by proposals related to certain fishing gears and to the phase-out of mobile bottom fishing in all MPAs by 2030;’

  4. Vote 8:Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by MEPs

    The part voted on

    ‘considers, therefore, that the Commission’s action plan presents an oversimplified and over-generalised approach, thus giving the impression that all MPAs can be implemented and managed in the same way, illustrated for example by proposals related to certain fishing gears and to the phase-out of mobile bottom fishing in all MPAs by 2030;’

  5. Vote 15:Separate vote on paragraph 19

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by MEPs

  6. Vote 16:Paragraph 19 — part 2

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 19/2

    Adopted 402 for, 135 against, 9 abstained

    12:26

    Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by MEPs

    ‘considers however, that the action plan takes some steps in the opposite direction, in particular in relation to its proposals on bottom trawling;’

  7. Vote 17:Separate vote on paragraph 23

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by MEPs

  8. Vote 18:Paragraph 23 — part 2

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 23/2

    Adopted 360 for, 134 against, 58 abstained

    12:27

    Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by MEPs

    The part voted on

    ‘and that it should be, in priority, regulated in the framework of the Technical Measures Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 2019/1241 ), whose aim is, as its title indicates, ‘the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems’;’

  9. Vote 22:Separate vote on paragraph 24

    Adopted show of hands

    Split vote by MEPs

  10. Vote 23:Paragraph 24 — part 2

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 24/2

    Adopted 317 for, 189 against, 51 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by MEPs

    The part voted on

    ‘they are considered by science as sustainable and compatible with achieving seabed conservation objectives or stocks being exploited above maximum sustainable yield levels;’

  11. Vote 24:Separate vote on paragraph 25

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 25

    Adopted 425 for, 121 against, 14 abstained

    12:28

    Roll call requested by Greens · separate vote by MEPs

· 1

  1. Vote 26:Final vote — text as a whole · the decisive vote

    A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

    Adopted 402 for, 95 against, 57 abstained

    12:28

← Back to the decision