Amendment 9, after paragraph 18
EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries
A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 18 – Am 9
Rejected
- For
- 177
- Against
- 343
- Abstained
- 38
roll-call vote at 12:26 · 32% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | For |
| Greens | 24 | 1 | 1 | 26 | For |
| S&D | 13 | 38 | 3 | 54 | Against |
| Renew | 8 | 27 | 0 | 35 | Against |
| EPP | 10 | 63 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 18 | 2 | 20 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 12 | 10 | 22 | Divided |
| ESN | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | Against |
| No group | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
4 MEPs of 558 Clear filters
Christine Anderson Germany · ESN
Against
Ivan David Czechia · ESN
For voted against their group’s line
Markus Buchheit Germany · ESN
Against
Milan Uhrík Slovakia · ESN
Against
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.