Paragraph 1 — part 2
Paragraph 1 — part 2
The instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua – RC-B9-0293/2022 – § 1/2
Result not yet in the record
- For
- 525
- Against
- 15
- Abstained
- 29
roll-call vote at 13:04 · 92% of votes cast in favour
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 | Abstained |
| Greens | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| S&D | 53 | 0 | 0 | 53 | For |
| Renew | 38 | 0 | 0 | 38 | For |
| EPP | 81 | 0 | 0 | 81 | For |
| ECR | 23 | 2 | 0 | 25 | For |
| Patriots | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | For |
| ESN | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | For |
| No group | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
9 MEPs of 569 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.