Thursday 9 June 2022

Parliament's data did not attach these votes to a report or motion.

• Amendment 1, adding text before paragraph 1

  The call for a Convention for the revision of the Treaties – B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 1

  · 77–477–1677 for, 477 against, 16 abstained

• Amendment 2, adding text before paragraph 1

  B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 2

  · 65–489–965 for, 489 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1

  B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 3

  · 62–478–3362 for, 478 against, 33 abstained

• Amendment 4, adding text before paragraph 1

  B9-0307/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 4

  · 153–398–17153 for, 398 against, 17 abstained

• Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1

  Menaces pour le droit à l'avortement dans le monde: démantèlement possible du droit à l'avortement par la Cour suprême des États-Unis – Global threats to abortion rights: the possible overturn of abortion rights in the US by the Supreme Court – Weltweite Bedrohungen des Rechts auf Abtreibung – etwaige Abschaffung des Rechts auf Abtreibung in den USA durch den Obersten Gerichtshof – B9-0299/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 3

  · 122–425–22122 for, 425 against, 22 abstained

• Amendment 1, adding text before paragraph 1

  B9-0299/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 1

  · 126–406–36126 for, 406 against, 36 abstained

• Amendment 2, adding text before paragraph 1

  B9-0299/2022 – Before § 1 – Am 2

  · 138–405–19138 for, 405 against, 19 abstained

• Paragraph 1 — part 2

  The instrumentalisation of justice as a repressive tool in Nicaragua – RC-B9-0293/2022 – § 1/2

  · 525–15–29525 for, 15 against, 29 abstained

• Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1

  RC-B9-0293/2022 – After § 1 – Am 2

  · 58–497–1458 for, 497 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1

  RC-B9-0293/2022 – After § 1 – Am 3

  · 59–475–3359 for, 475 against, 33 abstained

• Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 2

  B9-0307/2022 – After § 2 – Am 5

  · 65–388–11665 for, 388 against, 116 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 3

  The rule of law and the potential approval of the Polish national Recovery Plan (RRF) – RC-B9-0317/2022 – § 3

  · 414–136–23414 for, 136 against, 23 abstained

• Amendment 1 to paragraph 4

  RC-B9-0293/2022 – § 4 – Am 1

  · 267–287–11267 for, 287 against, 11 abstained

• Separate vote on paragraph 4

  The human rights situation in Xinjiang, including the Xinjiang police files – RC-B9-0310/2022 – § 4

  · 513–1–14513 for, 1 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 4

  B9-0307/2022 – After § 4 – Am 37

  · 116–336–113116 for, 336 against, 113 abstained

• Amendment 17 to paragraph 5

  B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 17

  · 99–359–10399 for, 359 against, 103 abstained

• Amendment 23 to paragraph 5

  B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 23

  · 104–354–105104 for, 354 against, 105 abstained

• Amendment 25 to paragraph 5

  B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 25

  · 64–381–11964 for, 381 against, 119 abstained

• Amendment 26 to paragraph 5

  B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 26

  · 65–373–12465 for, 373 against, 124 abstained

• Amendment 28 to paragraph 5

  B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 28

  · 206–258–96206 for, 258 against, 96 abstained

• Amendment 38 to paragraph 5

  B9-0307/2022 – § 5 – Am 38

  · 359–166–37359 for, 166 against, 37 abstained

• Paragraph 5 — part 1

  B9-0299/2022 – § 5/1

  · 366–139–53366 for, 139 against, 53 abstained

• Paragraph 5 — part 2

  B9-0299/2022 – § 5/2

  · 364–142–51364 for, 142 against, 51 abstained

• Amendment 29 to paragraph 6

  B9-0307/2022 – § 6 – Am 29

  · 115–326–110115 for, 326 against, 110 abstained

• Amendment 36 to paragraph 6

  B9-0307/2022 – § 6 – Am 36

  · 170–358–32170 for, 358 against, 32 abstained

• Amendment 39 to paragraph 6

  B9-0307/2022 – § 6 – Am 39

  · 391–110–56391 for, 110 against, 56 abstained

• Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 6

  RC-B9-0317/2022 – After § 6 – Am 1

  · 161–382–25161 for, 382 against, 25 abstained

• Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 8

  RC-B9-0310/2022 – After § 8 – Am 6

  · 122–402–25122 for, 402 against, 25 abstained

• Amendment 7 to paragraph 9

  RC-B9-0310/2022 – § 9 – Am 7

  · 42–413–9342 for, 413 against, 93 abstained

• Amendment 2 to paragraph 20

  Parliament’s right of initiative – A9-0142/2022 – Paulo Rangel – § 20 – Am 2

  · 113–250–214113 for, 250 against, 214 abstained

• Paragraph 21 — part 1

  B9-0299/2022 – § 21/1

  · 446–75–47446 for, 75 against, 47 abstained

• Paragraph 21 — part 2

  B9-0299/2022 – § 21/2

  · 366–151–47366 for, 151 against, 47 abstained

• Paragraph 28 — part 1

  B9-0299/2022 – § 28/1

  · 428–74–64428 for, 74 against, 64 abstained

• Paragraph 28 — part 2

  B9-0299/2022 – § 28/2

  · 411–82–50411 for, 82 against, 50 abstained

• Paragraph 28 — part 3

  B9-0299/2022 – § 28/3

  · 377–131–45377 for, 131 against, 45 abstained

• Separate vote on recital A

  B9-0299/2022 – Recital A

  · 375–142–51375 for, 142 against, 51 abstained

• Recital I — part 2

  RC-B9-0293/2022 – Recital I/2

  · 529–12–32529 for, 12 against, 32 abstained

• Amendment 8, adding text after recital D

  B9-0307/2022 – After recital D – Am 8

  · 69–444–4369 for, 444 against, 43 abstained

• Amendment 5, adding text after recital H

  RC-B9-0310/2022 – After recital H – Am 5

  · 43–491–2543 for, 491 against, 25 abstained

• Separate vote on recital L

  RC-B9-0293/2022 – Recital L

  · 258–309–7258 for, 309 against, 7 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  A9-0142/2022 – Paulo Rangel – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 420–117–35420 for, 117 against, 35 abstained

• Final vote on the provisional agreement

  International procurement instrument – A9-0337/2021 – Daniel Caspary – Provisional agreement – Am 107

  · 554–7–14554 for, 7 against, 14 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  Nouvel instrument commercial visant à interdire les produits issus du travail forcé – A new trade instrument to ban products made by forced labour – Ein neues Instrument zum Verbot von Produkten, die in Zwangsarbeit hergestellt wurden – B9-0291/2022 – Motion for a resolution

  · 503–6–4503 for, 6 against, 4 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  B9-0307/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 355–154–48355 for, 154 against, 48 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  RC-B9-0293/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 524–17–29524 for, 17 against, 29 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  B9-0299/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 364–154–37364 for, 154 against, 37 abstained

• Final vote on the motion for a resolution

  RC-B9-0317/2022 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

  · 411–129–31411 for, 129 against, 31 abstained