Wednesday 22 June 2022

Parliament's data did not attach these votes to a report or motion.

• Amendment 230 to Article 1, paragraph 3

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 1, § 3 – Am 230

  · 138–480–7138 for, 480 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 660 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3g – § 1 – Am 660

  · 131–494–5131 for, 494 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 661 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 5 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3g – after § 2 – Am 661

  · 192–423–7192 for, 423 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 499 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 3ga – § 1 – Am 499

  · 455–166–6455 for, 166 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 667 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC after Article 3ga – Am 667

  · 159–458–13159 for, 458 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 668 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 6 Directive 2003/87/EC after Article 3ga – Am 668

  · 174–450–7174 for, 450 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 633 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – § 3 – sub§ 2 – Am 633

  · 184–437–8184 for, 437 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 634 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10 – § 3 – sub§ 2 – Am 634

  · 146–472–9146 for, 472 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 671 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point a – point i Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – sub§ 2a – Am 671D

  · 147–474–7147 for, 474 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 636 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 636

  · 122–494–13122 for, 494 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 532 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 532

  · 453–152–24453 for, 152 against, 24 abstained

• Amendment 672 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b – point ii Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 2 – sub§ 3 – point d – Am 672

  · 82–533–1382 for, 533 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 673 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – after point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 5a – Am 673

  · 143–482–5143 for, 482 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 637 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point e – introductory part Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 6 – Am 637D

  · 126–499–6126 for, 499 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 638 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 8 – after § 3 – Am 638

  · 124–500–4124 for, 500 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 650 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point g Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 8 – § 4 – Am 650

  · 114–477–42114 for, 477 against, 42 abstained

• Separate vote on Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 12 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10b – Ams 639 640D 641D

  · 116–503–8116 for, 503 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 652 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 19 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 29a – Am 652

  · 150–472–10150 for, 472 against, 10 abstained

• Amendments 674 + 653 (voted as one) to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 21 Directive 2003/87/EC Chapter IVa – Am 674D= 653D=

  · 189–411–22189 for, 411 against, 22 abstained

• Amendment 577 to Article 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 21 Directive 2003/87/EC Chapter IVa – Am 577

  · 416–182–28416 for, 182 against, 28 abstained

• Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/1

  · 490–130–13490 for, 130 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 678 to Article 1 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1a – sub§ 2 – Am 678/1

  · 513–106–14513 for, 106 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/1

  · 486–128–18486 for, 128 against, 18 abstained

• Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/2

  · 446–167–13446 for, 167 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 678 to Article 1 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1a – sub§ 2 – Am 678/2

  · 468–127–17468 for, 127 against, 17 abstained

• Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/2

  · 512–98–13512 for, 98 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 3

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/3

  · 485–82–59485 for, 82 against, 59 abstained

• Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 3

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/3

  · 406–186–26406 for, 186 against, 26 abstained

• Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 4

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/4

  · 366–183–59366 for, 183 against, 59 abstained

• Amendment 679 to Article 1 — part 4

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 12 – point b Directive 2003/87/EC Article 10a – § 1 – after sub§ 2b – Am 679/4

  · 313–291–19313 for, 291 against, 19 abstained

• Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 5

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/5

  · 478–125–17478 for, 125 against, 17 abstained

• Amendment 677 to Article 1 — part 6

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 1 – § 1 – point 10 Directive 2003/87/EC Article 9 – § 3 – Am 677/6

  · 363–239–17363 for, 239 against, 17 abstained

• Amendment 643 to Article 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 5 – sub§ 1 – Am 643

  · 126–502–4126 for, 502 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 644 to Article 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 5a – Am 644

  · 124–501–5124 for, 501 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 645 to Article 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Article 2 – § 1 – after point 1 – point c Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Article 1 – § 6 – Am 645

  · 122–496–7122 for, 496 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 250, adding text after Article 5

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 5 – Am 250

  · 124–478–22124 for, 478 against, 22 abstained

• Amendment 130, adding text after Article 24 — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 24 – Am 130/1

  · 453–157–14453 for, 157 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 130, adding text after Article 24 — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Article 24 – Am 130/2

  · 488–133–3488 for, 133 against, 3 abstained

• Amendments 207 + 252 (voted as one) to Article 30, paragraph 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 1 – Am 207= 252=

  · 131–482–9131 for, 482 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 260 to Article 30, paragraph 2 — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 2 – Am 260/1

  · 380–236–8380 for, 236 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 260 to Article 30, paragraph 2 — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 30, § 2 – Am 260/2

  · 433–165–21433 for, 165 against, 21 abstained

• Amendment 258 to Article 31, after paragraph 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 258

  · 138–469–16138 for, 469 against, 16 abstained

• Amendment 191 to Article 31, after paragraph 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 2 – Am 191

  · 37–583–437 for, 583 against, 4 abstained

• Amendments 212 + 257 (voted as one) to Article 31, paragraph 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, § 1 – Am 212= 257=

  · 128–484–10128 for, 484 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/1

  · 469–153–4469 for, 153 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/1

  · 449–161–14449 for, 161 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/2

  · 490–127–6490 for, 127 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/2

  · 540–60–8540 for, 60 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 261 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 3

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 261/3

  · 376–240–7376 for, 240 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 3

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/3

  · 436–178–9436 for, 178 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 262 to Article 31, after paragraph 1 — part 4

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 31, after § 1 – Am 262/4

  · 340–263–18340 for, 263 against, 18 abstained

• Amendment 237 to Article 36, paragraph 3, after point d

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, after point d – Am 237

  · 122–493–7122 for, 493 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 264 to Article 36, paragraph 3, point c

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point c – Am 264

  · 491–119–12491 for, 119 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 215 to Article 36, paragraph 3, before point a

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, before point a – Am 215

  · 119–494–11119 for, 494 against, 11 abstained

• Amendments 198 + 216 + 263 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point a

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point a – Am 198= 216= 263=

  · 498–117–9498 for, 117 against, 9 abstained

• Amendments 199 + 217 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point b

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point b – Am 199= 217=

  · 485–119–19485 for, 119 against, 19 abstained

• Amendments 200 + 218 + 265 (voted as one) to Article 36, paragraph 3, point d

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, point d – Am 200= 218= 265=

  · 493–122–9493 for, 122 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 219 to Article 36, paragraph 3, after point d

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Article 36, § 3, after point d – Am 219

  · 121–479–21121 for, 479 against, 21 abstained

• Amendment 221 to recital 3

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 3 – Am 221

  · 127–481–11127 for, 481 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 629 to recital 7

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 7 – Am 629

  · 55–484–9255 for, 484 against, 92 abstained

• Amendment 8 to recital 10 — part 3

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 10 – Am 8/3

  · 318–296–9318 for, 296 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 186, adding text after Recital 12 — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 12 – Am 186/1

  · 120–493–6120 for, 493 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 658 to recital 29

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 658D

  · 156–470–5156 for, 470 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/1

  · 480–137–14480 for, 137 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/2

  · 417–197–10417 for, 197 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 451 to recital 29 — part 3

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 29 – Am 451/3

  · 348–271–12348 for, 271 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 676 to recital 30 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 30 – Am 676/1

  · 459–164–6459 for, 164 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 676 to recital 30 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 30 – Am 676/2

  · 320–276–21320 for, 276 against, 21 abstained

• Amendment 455 to recital 31 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 31 – Am 455/1

  · 490–122–10490 for, 122 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 455 to recital 31 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Recital 31 – Am 455/2

  · 462–151–16462 for, 151 against, 16 abstained

• Amendment 33 to recital 50

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 50 – Am 33

  · 121–496–7121 for, 496 against, 7 abstained

• Amendments 203 + 224 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 50

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 50 – Am 203= 224=

  · 139–476–4139 for, 476 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 194, adding text after Recital 51

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 51 – Am 194

  · 287–330–5287 for, 330 against, 5 abstained

• Amendments 205 + 226 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 52

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 52 – Am 205= 226=

  · 120–470–28120 for, 470 against, 28 abstained

• Amendment 40 to recital 55

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 40

  · 480–137–5480 for, 137 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 187 to recital 55 — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 187/1

  · 120–493–6120 for, 493 against, 6 abstained

• Amendment 187 to recital 55 — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Recital 55 – Am 187/2

  · 141–466–8141 for, 466 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 188, adding text after Recital 55

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – after Recital 55 – Am 188

  · 115–498–4115 for, 498 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 220

  Carbon border adjustment mechanism – A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Proposal to reject the Commission proposal – Am 220

  · 69–506–4869 for, 506 against, 48 abstained

• Amendment 14

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 14

  · 544–78–5544 for, 78 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 20

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 20

  · 490–129–4490 for, 129 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 25

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 25D

  · 479–134–10479 for, 134 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 177

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 177

  · 472–145–8472 for, 145 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 178

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 178

  · 475–140–9475 for, 140 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 179

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 179

  · 487–128–8487 for, 128 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 47

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 47

  · 464–150–8464 for, 150 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 675

  Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System – A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Proposal to reject the Commission proposal – Am 675

  · 114–499–12114 for, 499 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 456

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 456

  · 450–169–13450 for, 169 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 463

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 463

  · 441–182–7441 for, 182 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 508

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 508

  · 436–176–14436 for, 176 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 531

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 531

  · 438–180–14438 for, 180 against, 14 abstained

• Amendment 559

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 559

  · 415–199–17415 for, 199 against, 17 abstained

• Amendment 561

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 561

  · 499–97–35499 for, 97 against, 35 abstained

• Amendment 570

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 570

  · 419–202–11419 for, 202 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 620

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 620

  · 360–264–7360 for, 264 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 622

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 622

  · 460–158–13460 for, 158 against, 13 abstained

• Amendment 623

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 623

  · 444–168–12444 for, 168 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 446 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 446/1

  · 576–52–4576 for, 52 against, 4 abstained

• Amendment 509 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 509/1

  · 545–56–30545 for, 56 against, 30 abstained

• Amendment 547 — part 1

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/1

  · 566–59–5566 for, 59 against, 5 abstained

• Amendment 24 — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 24/2

  · 477–140–9477 for, 140 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 446 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 446/2

  · 484–127–8484 for, 127 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 462 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 462/2

  · 460–139–34460 for, 139 against, 34 abstained

• Amendment 506 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 506/rev/2

  · 439–182–11439 for, 182 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 509 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 509/2

  · 486–100–30486 for, 100 against, 30 abstained

• Amendment 522 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/2

  · 448–172–10448 for, 172 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 543 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 543/2

  · 493–130–8493 for, 130 against, 8 abstained

• Amendment 547 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/2

  · 411–194–3411 for, 194 against, 3 abstained

• Amendment 575 — part 2

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 575/2

  · 478–145–7478 for, 145 against, 7 abstained

• Amendment 522 — part 3

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/3

  · 442–169–15442 for, 169 against, 15 abstained

• Amendment 547 — part 3

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 547/3

  · 481–132–9481 for, 132 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 423 — part 4

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 423/4

  · 463–144–24463 for, 144 against, 24 abstained

• Amendment 522 — part 4

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Am 522/4

  · 331–287–12331 for, 287 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/1

  · 155–459–9155 for, 459 against, 9 abstained

• Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 1

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/1

  · 488–124–12488 for, 124 against, 12 abstained

• Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/2

  · 131–477–10131 for, 477 against, 10 abstained

• Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 2

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/2

  · 469–144–11469 for, 144 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 175 to Annex I — part 3

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 175/3

  · 457–144–11457 for, 144 against, 11 abstained

• Amendment 185 to Annex I — part 3

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Annex I – Am 185/3

  · 130–476–10130 for, 476 against, 10 abstained

• Final vote

  A9-0160/2022 – Mohammed Chahim – Commission proposal

  · 450–115–55450 for, 115 against, 55 abstained

• Final vote

  Social Climate Fund – A9-0157/2022 – David Casa, Esther de Lange – Commission proposal

  · 479–103–48479 for, 103 against, 48 abstained

• Final vote

  A9-0162/2022 – Peter Liese – Commission proposal

  · 439–157–32439 for, 157 against, 32 abstained