Amendment 1 — part 2, after paragraph 14
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 14 – Am 1/2
Adopted
- For
- 297
- Against
- 267
- Abstained
- 21
roll-call vote at 13:51 · 51% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘insists on the introduction of robust mechanisms allowing for the immediate suspension and full recovery of funds in cases of non-cooperation, or where the interests of the EU or the Member States are at stake;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 36 | 0 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 48 | 0 | 48 | Against |
| S&D | 1 | 113 | 0 | 114 | Against |
| Renew | 4 | 60 | 0 | 64 | Against |
| EPP | 117 | 5 | 18 | 140 | For |
| ECR | 70 | 0 | 0 | 70 | For |
| Patriots | 66 | 0 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 14 | 5 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 585 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.