Amendment 1 — part 1, after paragraph 14
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 14 – Am 1/1
Adopted
- For
- 304
- Against
- 268
- Abstained
- 21
roll-call vote at 13:51 · 51% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘Calls for the establishment of a stricter and more transparent framework governing the disbursement and oversight of EU development and cooperation funds to third countries;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 36 | 0 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 48 | 0 | 48 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 115 | 0 | 115 | Against |
| Renew | 3 | 60 | 2 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 124 | 4 | 16 | 144 | For |
| ECR | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| Patriots | 66 | 0 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | For |
| No group | 14 | 5 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 593 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.