Amendment 39, after paragraph 13
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 13 – Am 39
Rejected
- For
- 257
- Against
- 331
- Abstained
- 7
roll-call vote at 13:50 · 43% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 36 | 0 | 0 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 111 | 0 | 3 | 114 | For |
| Renew | 53 | 7 | 3 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 0 | 148 | 1 | 149 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 72 | 0 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 66 | 0 | 66 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 9 | 12 | 0 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 595 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.