Paragraph 12 — part 3
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – § 12/3
Adopted
- For
- 427
- Against
- 166
- Abstained
- 7
roll-call vote at 13:48 · 71% of votes cast in favour
Split vote by Patriots, S&D
The part voted on: ‘full and’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 36 | 0 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 45 | 3 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 113 | 2 | 0 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 65 | 0 | 0 | 65 | For |
| EPP | 151 | 1 | 0 | 152 | For |
| ECR | 47 | 24 | 0 | 71 | Divided |
| Patriots | 1 | 65 | 0 | 66 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 1 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 5 | 10 | 6 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 600 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.