Amendment 34, after paragraph 11
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 11 – Am 34
Rejected
- For
- 261
- Against
- 335
- Abstained
- 4
roll-call vote at 13:48 · 44% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 33 | 0 | 2 | 35 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 112 | 1 | 2 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 61 | 4 | 0 | 65 | For |
| EPP | 0 | 150 | 0 | 150 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 72 | 0 | 72 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 15 | 0 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
35 MEPs of 600 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.