Amendment 51, after paragraph 10
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 10 – Am 51
Rejected
- For
- 277
- Against
- 321
- Abstained
- 5
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 46% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 1 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 114 | 1 | 0 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 65 | 0 | 0 | 65 | For |
| EPP | 2 | 147 | 1 | 150 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 73 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 25 | 0 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 11 | 8 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 603 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.