Paragraph 10 — part 3
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – § 10/3
Adopted
- For
- 353
- Against
- 240
- Abstained
- 5
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 59% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Renew
The part voted on: ‘recalls, in this regard, that national policies such as mass regularisation cannot be adopted without regard for their impact on other Member States, the Schengen Area and the EU as a whole;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | Against |
| Greens | 2 | 47 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 4 | 107 | 3 | 114 | Against |
| Renew | 17 | 46 | 0 | 63 | Against |
| EPP | 151 | 0 | 0 | 151 | For |
| ECR | 72 | 0 | 0 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 66 | 0 | 0 | 66 | For |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | For |
| No group | 15 | 5 | 2 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
63 MEPs of 598 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.