Paragraph 10 — part 2
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – § 10/2
Adopted
- For
- 363
- Against
- 231
- Abstained
- 7
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 60% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Renew
The part voted on: ‘illegal’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | Against |
| Greens | 2 | 46 | 0 | 48 | Against |
| S&D | 10 | 102 | 3 | 115 | Against |
| Renew | 22 | 41 | 0 | 63 | Divided |
| EPP | 152 | 0 | 0 | 152 | For |
| ECR | 73 | 0 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 67 | 0 | 0 | 67 | For |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | For |
| No group | 11 | 7 | 4 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
35 MEPs of 601 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.