Paragraph 10 — part 1
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – § 10/1
Adopted
- For
- 390
- Against
- 205
- Abstained
- 4
roll-call vote at 13:45 · 65% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by EPP · split vote by Renew
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘illegal’ and ‘recalls, in this regard, that national policies such as mass regularisation cannot be adopted without regard for their impact on other Member States, the Schengen Area and the EU as a whole;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | Against |
| Greens | 2 | 46 | 1 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 10 | 103 | 1 | 114 | Against |
| Renew | 51 | 12 | 0 | 63 | For |
| EPP | 151 | 1 | 0 | 152 | For |
| ECR | 72 | 0 | 0 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 67 | 0 | 0 | 67 | For |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | For |
| No group | 11 | 8 | 2 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
21 MEPs of 599 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.