Amendment 6, after paragraph 9
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 9 – Am 6
Rejected
- For
- 266
- Against
- 295
- Abstained
- 37
roll-call vote at 13:44 · 44% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 1 | 113 | 0 | 114 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 63 | 2 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 86 | 30 | 30 | 146 | Divided |
| ECR | 73 | 0 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| ESN | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | For |
| No group | 12 | 5 | 5 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
114 MEPs of 598 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.