Amendment 66, after paragraph 7
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 7 – Am 66
Rejected
- For
- 204
- Against
- 395
- Abstained
- 5
roll-call vote at 13:43 · 34% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 34 | 1 | 0 | 35 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 109 | 5 | 1 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 5 | 59 | 1 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 152 | 1 | 153 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 73 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 69 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 8 | 11 | 2 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
35 MEPs of 604 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.