Amendment 5, after paragraph 7
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 7 – Am 5
Rejected
- For
- 202
- Against
- 380
- Abstained
- 18
roll-call vote at 13:42 · 34% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 2 | 32 | 1 | 35 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 114 | 0 | 114 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 57 | 7 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 30 | 121 | 1 | 152 | Against |
| ECR | 70 | 0 | 3 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 65 | 0 | 4 | 69 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 1 | 0 | 24 | For |
| No group | 11 | 6 | 2 | 19 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
69 MEPs of 600 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.