Amendment 29 to paragraph 6
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – § 6 – Am 29
Rejected
- For
- 261
- Against
- 340
- Abstained
- 6
roll-call vote at 13:41 · 43% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 1 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 110 | 4 | 1 | 115 | For |
| Renew | 60 | 4 | 0 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 0 | 151 | 2 | 153 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 74 | 0 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 69 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 7 | 13 | 2 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
36 MEPs of 607 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.