Amendment 75, after paragraph 5
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 5 – Am 75
Adopted
- For
- 343
- Against
- 247
- Abstained
- 5
roll-call vote at 13:41 · 58% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 5 | 28 | 0 | 33 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 1 | 109 | 2 | 112 | Against |
| Renew | 12 | 50 | 2 | 64 | Against |
| EPP | 146 | 4 | 0 | 150 | For |
| ECR | 74 | 0 | 0 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| ESN | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | For |
| No group | 13 | 7 | 1 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
112 MEPs of 595 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.