Amendment 74, after paragraph 5
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 5 – Am 74
Adopted
- For
- 338
- Against
- 261
- Abstained
- 8
roll-call vote at 13:41 · 56% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 49 | 0 | 49 | Against |
| S&D | 2 | 111 | 2 | 115 | Against |
| Renew | 10 | 50 | 4 | 64 | Against |
| EPP | 149 | 4 | 1 | 154 | For |
| ECR | 73 | 0 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 67 | 1 | 0 | 68 | For |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 12 | 9 | 1 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
115 MEPs of 607 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.