Amendment 27, after paragraph 5
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 5 – Am 27
Rejected
- For
- 201
- Against
- 390
- Abstained
- 14
roll-call vote at 13:40 · 33% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 1 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 108 | 2 | 3 | 113 | For |
| Renew | 4 | 57 | 4 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 0 | 152 | 0 | 152 | Against |
| ECR | 0 | 74 | 0 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 69 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 12 | 6 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
37 MEPs of 605 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.