Amendment 4, after paragraph 5
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 5 – Am 4
Rejected
- For
- 280
- Against
- 292
- Abstained
- 26
roll-call vote at 13:40 · 47% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 48 | 0 | 48 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 113 | 0 | 113 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 58 | 6 | 64 | Against |
| EPP | 101 | 31 | 15 | 147 | For |
| ECR | 74 | 0 | 0 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 12 | 5 | 5 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
113 MEPs of 598 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.