Amendment 47, after paragraph 4
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 4 – Am 47
Adopted
- For
- 437
- Against
- 82
- Abstained
- 82
roll-call vote at 13:39 · 73% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 1 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 9 | 3 | 34 | 46 | Abstained |
| S&D | 113 | 0 | 0 | 113 | For |
| Renew | 65 | 0 | 0 | 65 | For |
| EPP | 127 | 4 | 21 | 152 | For |
| ECR | 72 | 2 | 0 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 0 | 63 | 6 | 69 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 6 | 17 | 24 | Abstained |
| No group | 15 | 4 | 3 | 22 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
69 MEPs of 601 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.