Amendment 25, after paragraph 4
The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders
B10-0406/2026 – After § 4 – Am 25
Rejected
- For
- 231
- Against
- 350
- Abstained
- 18
roll-call vote at 13:39 · 39% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 111 | 0 | 2 | 113 | For |
| Renew | 20 | 37 | 6 | 63 | Divided |
| EPP | 2 | 141 | 5 | 148 | Against |
| ECR | 1 | 72 | 1 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 68 | 0 | 69 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 1 | 25 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 8 | 3 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
74 MEPs of 599 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.