Paragraph 5 — part 5
The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan
RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 5/5
Adopted
- For
- 543
- Against
- 23
- Abstained
- 36
roll-call vote at 13:38 · 90% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots, EPP, ECR
The part voted on: ‘for breaching the UN arms embargo, and to work with the UNSC to extend the embargo to all of Sudan;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 36 | 0 | 0 | 36 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 107 | 2 | 0 | 109 | For |
| Renew | 63 | 4 | 1 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 159 | 5 | 0 | 164 | For |
| ECR | 59 | 6 | 1 | 66 | For |
| Patriots | 33 | 5 | 23 | 61 | Divided |
| ESN | 22 | 0 | 2 | 24 | For |
| No group | 15 | 1 | 9 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 602 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.