Paragraph 5 — part 3
The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan
RC-B10-0357/2026 – § 5/3
Adopted
- For
- 563
- Against
- 14
- Abstained
- 28
roll-call vote at 13:37 · 93% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by Patriots, EPP, ECR
The part voted on: ‘to cease financing, arms supply or other support of the RSF; urges the EEAS and the Council to sanction individuals, entities and external enablers and private security companies,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 108 | 1 | 1 | 110 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 0 | 0 | 68 | For |
| EPP | 162 | 3 | 0 | 165 | For |
| ECR | 64 | 2 | 0 | 66 | For |
| Patriots | 41 | 5 | 16 | 62 | Divided |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 2 | 25 | For |
| No group | 13 | 3 | 9 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 605 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.