Amendment 5, after paragraph 1
Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets
B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 5
Rejected
- For
- 188
- Against
- 462
- Abstained
- 2
roll-call vote at 13:09 · 29% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 48 | 0 | 48 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 122 | 0 | 122 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 73 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| EPP | 4 | 168 | 1 | 173 | Against |
| ECR | 75 | 0 | 0 | 75 | For |
| Patriots | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| ESN | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | For |
| No group | 13 | 11 | 1 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
71 MEPs of 652 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.