Amendment 3 — part 3, after paragraph 4
Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich
B10-0294/2026 – After § 4 – Am 3/3
Rejected
- For
- 93
- Against
- 437
- Abstained
- 22
roll-call vote at 13:10 · 17% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN, ECR
The part voted on: ‘calls for the EU to take a more pragmatic approach and to re-engage with the authorities in Belarus in order to secure the release of further political prisoners;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 1 | 27 | 8 | 36 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 42 | 0 | 42 | Against |
| S&D | 0 | 105 | 0 | 105 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 61 | 0 | 62 | Against |
| EPP | 2 | 138 | 0 | 140 | Against |
| ECR | 12 | 46 | 5 | 63 | Against |
| Patriots | 37 | 14 | 6 | 57 | Divided |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 1 | 24 | For |
| No group | 17 | 4 | 2 | 23 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
63 MEPs of 552 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.