Paragraph 9 — part 2
Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland
B10-0295/2026 – § 9/2
Adopted
- For
- 357
- Against
- 144
- Abstained
- 49
roll-call vote at 13:28 · 65% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘underlines that deeper integration, coordination and the pooling of resources are indispensable to an effective EU response to Russia’s escalating threats;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 7 | 19 | 11 | 37 | Divided |
| Greens | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| S&D | 101 | 2 | 0 | 103 | For |
| Renew | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 | For |
| EPP | 134 | 0 | 0 | 134 | For |
| ECR | 7 | 23 | 34 | 64 | Divided |
| Patriots | 3 | 57 | 0 | 60 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 2 | 19 | 4 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
60 MEPs of 550 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.