Amendment 4 — part 2, after paragraph 4
Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts
RC-B10-0247/2026 – After § 4 – Am 4/2
Rejected
- For
- 142
- Against
- 380
- Abstained
- 36
roll-call vote at 13:36 · 25% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘calls for the EU to engage with the Taliban de facto authorities solely in order to elaborate diplomatic and technical solutions for the structured and safe return of Afghans and to assist EU Member States in their talks with Taliban representatives so as to facilitate the return of foreign nationals who pose a security threat;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | Against |
| Greens | 0 | 42 | 0 | 42 | Against |
| S&D | 2 | 99 | 1 | 102 | Against |
| Renew | 0 | 64 | 0 | 64 | Against |
| EPP | 2 | 129 | 1 | 132 | Against |
| ECR | 42 | 3 | 22 | 67 | Divided |
| Patriots | 64 | 0 | 6 | 70 | For |
| ESN | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 | For |
| No group | 9 | 6 | 6 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
67 MEPs of 558 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.