Amendment 4 — part 1, after paragraph 4
Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts
RC-B10-0247/2026 – After § 4 – Am 4/1
Rejected
- For
- 155
- Against
- 382
- Abstained
- 26
roll-call vote at 13:36 · 28% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘Notes that the Commission started exploratory talks with the Taliban in 2025, following a call from 19 EU Member States to coordinate a strategy for the return of Afghan nationals; notes that the Commission now plans to invite representatives of the Taliban for talks on the return of Afghans;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 38 | 0 | 38 | Against |
| Greens | 1 | 41 | 0 | 42 | Against |
| S&D | 1 | 104 | 0 | 105 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 64 | 0 | 65 | Against |
| EPP | 1 | 130 | 2 | 133 | Against |
| ECR | 52 | 0 | 15 | 67 | For |
| Patriots | 64 | 0 | 6 | 70 | For |
| ESN | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 | For |
| No group | 13 | 5 | 3 | 21 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
38 MEPs of 563 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.