Paragraph 18 — part 3
The need to reduce work-related fatalities
B10-0244/2026 – § 18/3
Adopted
- For
- 313
- Against
- 94
- Abstained
- 58
roll-call vote at 14:02 · 67% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘highlights the importance of ensuring concrete added value in support of national enforcement authorities, including through strengthened concerted and joint labour inspections and the possibility to contribute more effectively to identifying and tackling violations; stresses the need to promote greater alignment and simplification of rules on labour mobility and related control procedures, including through more uniform rules and more effective information exchange, in line with ELA guidance;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 31 | 0 | 1 | 32 | For |
| Greens | 40 | 0 | 0 | 40 | For |
| S&D | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| Renew | 50 | 3 | 1 | 54 | For |
| EPP | 109 | 2 | 2 | 113 | For |
| ECR | 0 | 30 | 30 | 60 | Divided |
| Patriots | 2 | 35 | 19 | 56 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 19 | 2 | 21 | Against |
| No group | 10 | 5 | 3 | 18 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
60 MEPs of 465 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.