Paragraph 9 — part 2
The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward
A10-0121/2026 – Isabella Lövin – § 9/2
Adopted
- For
- 306
- Against
- 225
- Abstained
- 38
roll-call vote at 13:40 · 54% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Greens · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: ‘believes that, based on scientific advice, recovery pauses for the respective stocks must be urgently considered, until scientific evidence demonstrates a clear and sustained recovery of the stocks;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 37 | 0 | 0 | 37 | For |
| Greens | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| S&D | 104 | 0 | 0 | 104 | For |
| Renew | 61 | 3 | 0 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 45 | 71 | 19 | 135 | Divided |
| ECR | 3 | 54 | 9 | 66 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 70 | 6 | 76 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 13 | 3 | 4 | 20 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
20 MEPs of 569 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.