Paragraph 19 — part 2
Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response
B10-0245/2026 – § 19/2
Adopted
- For
- 463
- Against
- 151
- Abstained
- 28
roll-call vote at 13:49 · 72% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by The Left · split vote by EPP
The part voted on: ‘reiterates the importance of the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence without delay and of bringing the legal definition of rape in line with international human rights standards;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 49 | 0 | 0 | 49 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 0 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 140 | 10 | 5 | 155 | For |
| ECR | 4 | 68 | 3 | 75 | Against |
| Patriots | 27 | 39 | 12 | 78 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 3 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 8 | 11 | 5 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
75 MEPs of 642 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.