Paragraph 11 — part 1
Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response
B10-0245/2026 – § 11/1
Adopted
- For
- 474
- Against
- 73
- Abstained
- 91
roll-call vote at 13:47 · 74% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR · split vote by ECR
The part voted on: ‘Strongly condemns the closure of the Special Prosecutor’s Office in light of its evident impact on the investigation and prosecution of corruption,’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 40 | 0 | 1 | 41 | For |
| Greens | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | For |
| S&D | 121 | 0 | 0 | 121 | For |
| Renew | 67 | 0 | 0 | 67 | For |
| EPP | 156 | 0 | 0 | 156 | For |
| ECR | 34 | 3 | 39 | 76 | Divided |
| Patriots | 0 | 37 | 41 | 78 | Divided |
| ESN | 0 | 23 | 3 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 8 | 10 | 7 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 638 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.