Paragraph 7 — part 2
The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment
RC-B10-0206/2026 – § 7/2
Adopted
- For
- 380
- Against
- 173
- Abstained
- 7
roll-call vote at 13:37 · 68% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘reiterates its support for adding hate crime, which could cover the most severe forms of cyberbullying, to the list of EU crimes under Article 83(1) TFEU;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 29 | 1 | 0 | 30 | For |
| Greens | 43 | 0 | 0 | 43 | For |
| S&D | 108 | 0 | 0 | 108 | For |
| Renew | 63 | 1 | 0 | 64 | For |
| EPP | 129 | 0 | 5 | 134 | For |
| ECR | 2 | 66 | 0 | 68 | Against |
| Patriots | 1 | 66 | 0 | 67 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | Against |
| No group | 5 | 18 | 2 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
25 MEPs of 560 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.