Paragraph 112 — part 2
The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/2
Adopted
- For
- 408
- Against
- 192
- Abstained
- 22
roll-call vote at 14:56 · 66% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by S&D · split vote by ECR, EPP
The part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that migration and asylum policies, including the Pact on Migration and Asylum, are implemented in full compliance with the Charter, the principle of non-refoulement and the principle of responsibility-sharing to ensure that people’s rights to asylum and international protection are upheld;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 41 | 0 | 0 | 41 | For |
| Greens | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 | For |
| S&D | 118 | 0 | 0 | 118 | For |
| Renew | 62 | 0 | 0 | 62 | For |
| EPP | 134 | 5 | 17 | 156 | For |
| ECR | 0 | 77 | 1 | 78 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 73 | 0 | 73 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 25 | 1 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 9 | 12 | 3 | 24 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
62 MEPs of 622 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.