Paragraph 2 — part 2
Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025
A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – § 2/2
Adopted
- For
- 407
- Against
- 190
- Abstained
- 25
roll-call vote at 14:59 · 65% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by Patriots · split vote by Patriots
The part voted on: ‘notes with concern that national constitutional and supreme courts in some Member States have been undermining the well-established doctrine of the primacy of EU law; stresses that such developments should always lead to swift enforcement activities by the Commission, including infringement procedures;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 32 | 4 | 7 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 45 | 0 | 0 | 45 | For |
| S&D | 118 | 0 | 0 | 118 | For |
| Renew | 61 | 0 | 0 | 61 | For |
| EPP | 147 | 3 | 7 | 157 | For |
| ECR | 0 | 71 | 3 | 74 | Against |
| Patriots | 0 | 68 | 7 | 75 | Against |
| ESN | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | Against |
| No group | 4 | 20 | 1 | 25 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
24 MEPs of 622 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.