Paragraph 109 — part 1
Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – § 109/1
Adopted
- For
- 532
- Against
- 87
- Abstained
- 32
roll-call vote at 13:32 · 82% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN · separate vote by Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘as a result of rule of law breaches’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 36 | 1 | 6 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 124 | 0 | 0 | 124 | For |
| Renew | 71 | 0 | 0 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 165 | 2 | 0 | 167 | For |
| ECR | 9 | 40 | 21 | 70 | Divided |
| Patriots | 43 | 32 | 2 | 77 | Divided |
| ESN | 23 | 3 | 0 | 26 | For |
| No group | 15 | 9 | 3 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
70 MEPs of 651 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.