Paragraph 89 — part 2
Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – § 89/2
Adopted
- For
- 483
- Against
- 107
- Abstained
- 66
roll-call vote at 13:30 · 74% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN
The part voted on: ‘underlines that the proposal for a Performance Regulation is a first step towards putting in place a horizontal expenditure tracking and performance monitoring framework for the budget that aims to reduce administrative burden; considers that this approach, if adequately implemented, may lead to strengthened democratic oversight; stresses that a comprehensive inclusion of horizontal principles in a single framework would allow for meaningful tracking and better reflect the Union’s political priorities; insists that the performance framework must prioritise impact indicators that measure actual outcomes for citizens; stresses that the proposed Performance Regulation must ensure that reporting indicators are mandatory where relevant and comparable across all Member States and management modes; warns that, without such comparability, the discharge authority will be unable to assess relative effectiveness or identify underperforming programmes; underlines that performance indicators must be explicitly derived from the objectives of each programme and should capture outputs, outcomes and impacts;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 12 | 2 | 29 | 43 | Abstained |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 125 | 0 | 0 | 125 | For |
| Renew | 68 | 3 | 0 | 71 | For |
| EPP | 162 | 1 | 4 | 167 | For |
| ECR | 64 | 9 | 0 | 73 | For |
| Patriots | 0 | 53 | 24 | 77 | Against |
| ESN | 1 | 25 | 1 | 27 | Against |
| No group | 5 | 14 | 8 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
27 MEPs of 656 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.