Paragraph 4 — part 1
Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034
A10-0105/2026 – Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares – § 4/1
Adopted
- For
- 569
- Against
- 70
- Abstained
- 17
roll-call vote at 13:14 · 87% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ESN · split vote by ESN, Patriots
The part voted on: Text as a whole without the words: ‘reiterates the need to maintain a horizontal implementation framework and rules for these policies, including rule of law conditionality, in order to ensure coherence and avoid fragmentation;’
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 39 | 2 | 2 | 43 | For |
| Greens | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46 | For |
| S&D | 116 | 9 | 2 | 127 | For |
| Renew | 61 | 9 | 0 | 70 | For |
| EPP | 166 | 1 | 0 | 167 | For |
| ECR | 61 | 9 | 4 | 74 | For |
| Patriots | 57 | 17 | 2 | 76 | For |
| ESN | 5 | 20 | 1 | 26 | Against |
| No group | 18 | 3 | 6 | 27 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
26 MEPs of 656 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.