Amendments 125 + 129 (voted as one), after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120)
Generalised scheme of tariff preferences
A9-0147/2022 – Bernd Lange – After Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) – Am 125= 129=
Rejected
- For
- 251
- Against
- 334
- Abstained
- 48
roll-call vote at 13:57 · 40% of votes cast in favour
Roll call requested by ECR, Members
How the groups voted
A group’s line is the position at least two thirds of its voting MEPs took; otherwise it is shown as Divided. Groups from left to right.
| Group | For | Against | Abstained | of | Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | 34 | 9 | 43 | Against |
| Greens | 6 | 40 | 0 | 46 | Against |
| S&D | 31 | 79 | 0 | 110 | Against |
| Renew | 1 | 70 | 0 | 71 | Against |
| EPP | 60 | 95 | 5 | 160 | Divided |
| ECR | 49 | 4 | 19 | 72 | For |
| Patriots | 64 | 6 | 6 | 76 | For |
| ESN | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | For |
| No group | 13 | 6 | 9 | 28 | — |
“of” = MEPs of the group who voted. Groups as they are now.
Every MEP
28 MEPs of 633 Clear filters
“Votes in which an MEP voted differently from their group: on decision pages, against a line at least two thirds of the group took; in loyalty figures, against the position most of the group took.” = voted otherwise than a clear line (two thirds of its votes) of the group they sit in now. MEPs with no vote recorded are not listed.